Opera 10.63 released
By Ruari Ødegaard. Tuesday, 12. October 2010, 09:48:55
Web Sockets enter the Opera House
Kommentare
getnikkoo # 12. October 2010, 10:22
hey it is slower than the last benchmarking made please check thire is some core problemMorphdreamer # 12. October 2010, 10:24
Thanks, really great job!
Just one question - are fixes from 10.63 included in latest 10.70 build?ouzowtf # 12. October 2010, 10:56
and before you ask, yes if you have 10.63 RC2, you already have the final.
Ruari, as I saidBut yeah, of course you are right.
Daniel Hendrycks # 12. October 2010, 11:02
Originally posted by Tygas:
Whats the point releasing 10.63 if there is 10.70 ?
This is a stable version with fixes for those who do not want to use experimental builds.Hyypia # 12. October 2010, 11:11
I think you’re wasting your time for another 10.6X builds. You should focus on Opera 10.70 instead, make it more stable and release it soon !Installation of Opera 10.63 on Windows 7 x64:* triggers the “unsigned msi” warning
* wants to create icon in the non-existent Quick Launch bar
* demands to create a desktop icon although I deselected the option when installed 10.60 and on every update after itNeeds more work!
Ruari Ødegaard # 12. October 2010, 11:21
Originally posted by ouzoWTF:
Yeah, I wondered when you would show up to point this out!Ruari, as I said
Tommy A. Olsen # 12. October 2010, 11:23
Originally posted by hyypia:
I think you’re wasting your time for another 10.6X builds. You should focus on Opera 10.70 instead, make it more stable and release it soon !
We’re not using that much time on 10.63. It is mostly a matter of patching safe and stable fixes from 10.70, which is our development branch. Security is always the highest priority for us, and users of stable Opera versions such as 10.6 can always expect this kind of service from us.Ruari Ødegaard # 12. October 2010, 11:25
Originally posted by Tygas:
Whats the point releasing 10.63 if there is 10.70 ?
Originally posted by hyypia:
You will notice from the changelogs that these builds include 5 security fixes. Hence we needed to get it out ASAP to keep our users secure. We couldn’t just release a 10.70 as final because 10.70 contains a lot of other things as well (some of which currently cause regressions). Hence getting 10.70 stable takes longer, which would have delayed how fast we could get out a secure version. So yes, this build was needed.I think you’re wasting your time for another 10.6X builds. You should focus on Opera 10.70 instead, make it more stable and release it soon !
Ruari Ødegaard # 12. October 2010, 11:26
Originally posted by Morphdreamer:
Not quite, but almost. However before 10.70 (or some future release with a different number) goes final it will contain all of the fixes from 10.63.Just one question - are fixes from 10.63 included in latest 10.70 build?
Ruari Ødegaard # 12. October 2010, 11:35
Originally posted by getnikkoo:
Could you be a bit clearer. Are you comparing with the previous 10.70 build snapshot, which is faster because it has a newer Core rendering engine (hence that is expected) or are you saying that 10.63 is slower than 10.62?hey it is slower than the last benchmarking made
joshas # 12. October 2010, 11:48
Mod edit: Vague comment removed. Please be specific, and list the exact details of any problems you may be referring to.Jeroen Hoekx # 12. October 2010, 12:09
Schreibe einen Kommentar
Per email auf dertyp: auf die Schnelle gepostet