was mir so ein- und auffällt... oder auch nicht.
dertypr
12.10.2010
Opera 10.63 released [Opera Desktop Team]

Opera 10.63 released

By Ruari Ødegaard. Tuesday, 12. October 2010, 09:48:55

Opera 10.63 has been released as a recommended upgrade, offering security and stability enhancements.

Download Opera 10.63

Changelogs
Windows / Mac / *nix
Thanks to everyone here who helped out with testing and before you ask, yes if you have 10.63 RC2, you already have the final. :D


Web Sockets enter the Opera House

Kommentare

Igor Machulsky # 12. October 2010, 09:50

All right!

pieRr0Ur # 12. October 2010, 09:51

Thanks!

kiaM # 12. October 2010, 10:07

Thank you for the good work!

getnikkoo # 12. October 2010, 10:22

hey it is slower than the last benchmarking made please check thire is some core problem

http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/index.action

Morphdreamer # 12. October 2010, 10:24

Thanks, really great job! :cheers:
Just one question - are fixes from 10.63 included in latest 10.70 build?

nimu_chan # 12. October 2010, 10:27

Very cool. Thanks :up:

samMD # 12. October 2010, 10:49

:up:

Josemelo # 12. October 2010, 10:54

Thanks! :up:

ouzowtf # 12. October 2010, 10:56

and before you ask, yes if you have 10.63 RC2, you already have the final.


Ruari, as I said :D But yeah, of course you are right.
:up:

Tygas # 12. October 2010, 11:00

Whats the point releasing 10.63 if there is 10.70 ?

Daniel Hendrycks # 12. October 2010, 11:02

Originally posted by Tygas:

Whats the point releasing 10.63 if there is 10.70 ?


This is a stable version with fixes for those who do not want to use experimental builds.

Hyypia # 12. October 2010, 11:11

I think you’re wasting your time for another 10.6X builds. You should focus on Opera 10.70 instead, make it more stable and release it soon !

Teo # 12. October 2010, 11:20

Installation of Opera 10.63 on Windows 7 x64:

* triggers the “unsigned msi” warning
* wants to create icon in the non-existent Quick Launch bar
* demands to create a desktop icon although I deselected the option when installed 10.60 and on every update after it

Needs more work!

Ruari Ødegaard # 12. October 2010, 11:21

Originally posted by ouzoWTF:

Ruari, as I said

Yeah, I wondered when you would show up to point this out! :P

Tommy A. Olsen # 12. October 2010, 11:23

Originally posted by hyypia:

I think you’re wasting your time for another 10.6X builds. You should focus on Opera 10.70 instead, make it more stable and release it soon !


We’re not using that much time on 10.63. It is mostly a matter of patching safe and stable fixes from 10.70, which is our development branch. Security is always the highest priority for us, and users of stable Opera versions such as 10.6 can always expect this kind of service from us.

Ruari Ødegaard # 12. October 2010, 11:25

Originally posted by Tygas:

Whats the point releasing 10.63 if there is 10.70 ?

Originally posted by hyypia:

I think you’re wasting your time for another 10.6X builds. You should focus on Opera 10.70 instead, make it more stable and release it soon !

You will notice from the changelogs that these builds include 5 security fixes. Hence we needed to get it out ASAP to keep our users secure. We couldn’t just release a 10.70 as final because 10.70 contains a lot of other things as well (some of which currently cause regressions). Hence getting 10.70 stable takes longer, which would have delayed how fast we could get out a secure version. So yes, this build was needed.

Ruari Ødegaard # 12. October 2010, 11:26

Originally posted by Morphdreamer:

Just one question - are fixes from 10.63 included in latest 10.70 build?

Not quite, but almost. However before 10.70 (or some future release with a different number) goes final it will contain all of the fixes from 10.63.

Ruari Ødegaard # 12. October 2010, 11:35

Originally posted by getnikkoo:

hey it is slower than the last benchmarking made

Could you be a bit clearer. Are you comparing with the previous 10.70 build snapshot, which is faster because it has a newer Core rendering engine (hence that is expected) or are you saying that 10.63 is slower than 10.62?

z@h3k # 12. October 2010, 11:43

Thanks.

joshas # 12. October 2010, 11:48

Mod edit: Vague comment removed. Please be specific, and list the exact details of any problems you may be referring to.

Jeroen Hoekx # 12. October 2010, 12:09

From the changelog:

> Release date: Octobeer 12, 2010

I can see why this build is needed :-)

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Per email auf dertyp: auf die Schnelle gepostet